1. What do you think - are people healthier because of the Internet or is the Internet causing trouble? In one or two sentences, write your reaction on a post it and post on the board in the appropriate spot. (Pick a side! You can't go for both on this activity.)
"There Will Come Soft Rains" by Ray Bradbury - as we read this, keep track of the futuristic inventions that are just the norm today. (Chart provided)
2. We will finish "There Will Come Soft Rains." Continue with your prediction/reality chart.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LzhlU8rXgHc Story read by Leonard Nimoy
3. Technology through the eyes of an artist -
A. Think of a technical object. This might be the gadget of gizmo you researched for a homework assignment - something from home. Or, you might want t select something else.

Looking
at Art
· What is
the title of the work? How does the title help you to understand the message?
What is the message?
· How does this work relate to your topic?
Discuss.
· What is
the most obvious image in the work. To where is your eye drawn?
· Look at
the colors. Are they symbolic? Would the message be different if the colors
were different? Explain.
· Study the
shading and shadowing. How do these elements impact the overall message?
· How do
the lines and angles impact your eye as you study the work?
· Who is
the artist? When was the work created? Is the artist's message about a specific
event in history? What was going on in the world when the work was created? Is
the art universal - speaks to people of all times and in all places, or is it
limited to the audience for whom it was created.
· How does
the work relate to us in 21st century America?
Assignment: Create a 3-5 slide PowerPoint or Prezi presentation. Think of yourself as the guide at a 21st century art gallery and share the art with the class on Tuesday.
Reminders:
A. The art must appear on the first slide.
B. No more than six bullets per slide.
C. No more than six words per bullet.
(50 points - 30 for the slides/20 for the presentation)
Homework
Read "OMG! We've Been Here B4" by Clive Thompson http://www.smithsonianmag.com/innovation/texting-isnt-first-new-technology-thought-impair-social-skills-180958091/ (Links to an external site.)
Answer the following:
- What does the author claim? In other words, what is the point of the article?
- What reasons does the author provide for believing that claim?
- What proof or evidence does the author provide to convince the reader that the reasons are valid?
- Was the author convincing? If so, what did the author do to
convince you of the claim? If not, what was weak about the argument?
Read "OMG! We've Been Here B4" by Clive Thompson http://www.smithsonianmag.com/innovation/texting-isnt-first-new-technology-thought-impair-social-skills-180958091/ (Links to an external site.)
Answer the following:
- What does the author claim? In other words, what is the point of the article?
- What reasons does the author provide for believing that claim?
- What proof or evidence does the author provide to convince the reader that the reasons are valid?
- Was the author convincing? If so, what did the author do to convince you of the claim? If not, what was weak about the argument?
FILED UNDER:
art
Exmple:

Assignment: Prepare a 3 slice or bubble PowerPoint or Prezi show to share wth the class on Tuesday. Your task is to explain the work of art to the class.
Remiders:
No more than six bullets per slide
No ore that six words per bullet
One slide must show the work of art.
Post in CANVAS. (50 points - 30 for the slides and 20 for the presentation)
Homework
Read "OMG! We've Been Here B4" by Clive Thompson http://www.smithsonianmag.com/innovation/texting-isnt-first-new-technology-thought-impair-social-skills-180958091/
Answer the following:
1. What does the author claim? In other words, what is the point of the article?
2. What reasons does the author provide for believing that claim?
3. What proof or evidence does the author provide to convince the reader that the reasons are valid?
4. Was the author convincing? If so, what did the author do to convince you of the claim? If not, what was weak about the argument?